Although our Queen was 80 earlier this year. such is the arcane nature of constitutional monarchy that it is not until this week that she celebrates her so-called official. as opposed to her real. this is perhaps a good time to take stock.
The Queen was born in a house in Bruton Street. at a time of extreme national unrest and division. A rancorous miners' strike was escalating into what was to be the brief but bitter General Strike of 1926.
Paradoxically. 17 Bruton Street was the home of her grandparents. the Earl and Countess of Strathmore. and the earl was one of the country's richest coal kings. a man who owned many mines. So. though she could hardly help it. that was an unfortunate start for the future monarch; and yet one of our Queen's triumphs is that she has always managed to avoid being identified with any sectional or class interest.
She has been at the centre of the national stage for well over 50 years and she has hardly ever put a foot wrong. despite constant scrutiny. Of course. in Scotland many of us validly resent the fact that she is officially but erroneously known here as Elizabeth II. for north of the border she is Elizabeth I. But it was our own Scottish Court of Session. that decided that she would be known in Scotland. as Elizabeth II.
My personal and probably fanciful hunch is that she has so successfully been the symbol of the UK that she wishes to beat her distinguished forbear. and reign for more than 64 years. Unlike that of Victoria. her reign has not coincided with a period of growing national power and success. Quite the contrary.
The UK is much diminished internationally from what it was when she was crowned. Now it is a mere bit player in the world. not even the most important country in Europe any more.
Yet this small and self-effacing woman. with her constant dignity and reticence. has been a reassuring figure during the years of decline. which have also been years of swift and intensive social and cultural change. and persistent technological and biological innovation. Somehow. she has always managed to present a serene and steadying presence in confusing and unsettling times.
Of course. it's all very well being calm and reassuring. but she has also eschewed emotion and she has been. a little dull. In 1983 this newspaper celebrated its bicentenary. Two of the distinguished visitors to The Herald offices that year were the then prime minister. and the Queen.
Even Mrs Thatcher's many critics among The Herald staff had to admit that her visit went remarkably well. It helped that she arrived late in the evening. Drink had been taken. and continued to be taken. and if the truth were told. Mrs Thatcher enjoyed one or two whiskies herself. As she progressed from floor to floor. followed by an increasingly jovial entourage of executives. dignitaries and other hangers on. her visit turned into an unlikely triumph. When she reached the picture desk she sat down. kicked off her shoes and opined loudly on the pictures on offer.
By contrast. the Queen's visit was quiet and restrained. and it reflected her idea of the monarchy: dutiful. a little buttoned up. never risking controversy. The Queen's notion of being regal most certainly does not involve trying to be a Queen of Hearts. And that is probably how a constitutional monarch should be.
Indeed. it is because our Queen has been so effective in subsuming her emotions. her opinions and to some extent her personality that she has been such an effective and unifying force in our national life. She has seen off nine prime ministers (apparently Harold Wilson was her favourite) and she has helped the nation through traumatic times such as the Suez crisis and the miners' strike of 1984-85. For that reason I reckon that when the sad day comes when she dies. it will be a genuinely traumatic moment. not just for her older subjects. who find it easy to identify with her. but for the whole UK.
By not promoting herself. she has become a most popular national symbol. Without being at all ghoulish. I now reckon it would be better were she to hand over to her son Charles sooner rather than later. A dignified abdication would be in keeping with the tone she has set.
Although our Queen was 80 earlier this year. such is the arcane nature of constitutional monarchy that it is not until this week that she celebrates her so-called official. as opposed to her real. this is perhaps a good time to take stock.
The Queen was born in a house in Bruton Street. at a time of extreme national unrest and division. A rancorous miners' strike was escalating into what was to be the brief but bitter General Strike of 1926.
Paradoxically. 17 Bruton Street was the home of her grandparents. the Earl and Countess of Strathmore. and the earl was one of the country's richest coal kings. a man who owned many mines. So. though she could hardly help it. that was an unfortunate start for the future monarch; and yet one of our Queen's triumphs is that she has always managed to avoid being identified with any sectional or class interest.
She has been at the centre of the national stage for well over 50 years and she has hardly ever put a foot wrong. despite constant scrutiny. Of course. in Scotland many of us validly resent the fact that she is officially but erroneously known here as Elizabeth II. for north of the border she is Elizabeth I. But it was our own Scottish Court of Session. that decided that she would be known in Scotland. as Elizabeth II.
My personal and probably fanciful hunch is that she has so successfully been the symbol of the UK that she wishes to beat her distinguished forbear. and reign for more than 64 years. Unlike that of Victoria. her reign has not coincided with a period of growing national power and success. Quite the contrary.
The UK is much diminished internationally from what it was when she was crowned. Now it is a mere bit player in the world. not even the most important country in Europe any more.
Yet this small and self-effacing woman. with her constant dignity and reticence. has been a reassuring figure during the years of decline. which have also been years of swift and intensive social and cultural change. and persistent technological and biological innovation. Somehow. she has always managed to present a serene and steadying presence in confusing and unsettling times.
Of course. it's all very well being calm and reassuring. but she has also eschewed emotion and she has been. a little dull. In 1983 this newspaper celebrated its bicentenary. Two of the distinguished visitors to The Herald offices that year were the then prime minister. and the Queen.
Even Mrs Thatcher's many critics among The Herald staff had to admit that her visit went remarkably well. It helped that she arrived late in the evening. Drink had been taken. and continued to be taken. and if the truth were told. Mrs Thatcher enjoyed one or two whiskies herself. As she progressed from floor to floor. followed by an increasingly jovial entourage of executives. dignitaries and other hangers on. her visit turned into an unlikely triumph. When she reached the picture desk she sat down. kicked off her shoes and opined loudly on the pictures on offer.
By contrast. the Queen's visit was quiet and restrained. and it reflected her idea of the monarchy: dutiful. a little buttoned up. never risking controversy. The Queen's notion of being regal most certainly does not involve trying to be a Queen of Hearts. And that is probably how a constitutional monarch should be.
Indeed. it is because our Queen has been so effective in subsuming her emotions. her opinions and to some extent her personality that she has been such an effective and unifying force in our national life. She has seen off nine prime ministers (apparently Harold Wilson was her favourite) and she has helped the nation through traumatic times such as the Suez crisis and the miners' strike of 1984-85. For that reason I reckon that when the sad day comes when she dies. it will be a genuinely traumatic moment. not just for her older subjects. who find it easy to identify with her. but for the whole UK.
By not promoting herself. she has become a most popular national symbol. Without being at all ghoulish. I now reckon it would be better were she to hand over to her son Charles sooner rather than later. A dignified abdication would be in keeping with the tone she has set.
Although our Queen was 80 earlier this year. such is the arcane nature of constitutional monarchy that it is not until this week that she celebrates her so-called official. as opposed to her real. this is perhaps a good time to take stock.
The Queen was born in a house in Bruton Street. at a time of extreme national unrest and division. A rancorous miners' strike was escalating into what was to be the brief but bitter General Strike of 1926.
Paradoxically. 17 Bruton Street was the home of her grandparents. the Earl and Countess of Strathmore. and the earl was one of the country's richest coal kings. a man who owned many mines. So. though she could hardly help it. that was an unfortunate start for the future monarch; and yet one of our Queen's triumphs is that she has always managed to avoid being identified with any sectional or class interest.
She has been at the centre of the national stage for well over 50 years and she has hardly ever put a foot wrong. despite constant scrutiny. Of course. in Scotland many of us validly resent the fact that she is officially but erroneously known here as Elizabeth II. for north of the border she is Elizabeth I. But it was our own Scottish Court of Session. that decided that she would be known in Scotland. as Elizabeth II.
My personal and probably fanciful hunch is that she has so successfully been the symbol of the UK that she wishes to beat her distinguished forbear. and reign for more than 64 years. Unlike that of Victoria. her reign has not coincided with a period of growing national power and success. Quite the contrary.
The UK is much diminished internationally from what it was when she was crowned. Now it is a mere bit player in the world. not even the most important country in Europe any more.
Yet this small and self-effacing woman. with her constant dignity and reticence. has been a reassuring figure during the years of decline. which have also been years of swift and intensive social and cultural change. and persistent technological and biological innovation. Somehow. she has always managed to present a serene and steadying presence in confusing and unsettling times.
Of course. it's all very well being calm and reassuring. but she has also eschewed emotion and she has been. a little dull. In 1983 this newspaper celebrated its bicentenary. Two of the distinguished visitors to The Herald offices that year were the then prime minister. and the Queen.
Even Mrs Thatcher's many critics among The Herald staff had to admit that her visit went remarkably well. It helped that she arrived late in the evening. Drink had been taken. and continued to be taken. and if the truth were told. Mrs Thatcher enjoyed one or two whiskies herself. As she progressed from floor to floor. followed by an increasingly jovial entourage of executives. dignitaries and other hangers on. her visit turned into an unlikely triumph. When she reached the picture desk she sat down. kicked off her shoes and opined loudly on the pictures on offer.
By contrast. the Queen's visit was quiet and restrained. and it reflected her idea of the monarchy: dutiful. a little buttoned up. never risking controversy. The Queen's notion of being regal most certainly does not involve trying to be a Queen of Hearts. And that is probably how a constitutional monarch should be.
Indeed. it is because our Queen has been so effective in subsuming her emotions. her opinions and to some extent her personality that she has been such an effective and unifying force in our national life. She has seen off nine prime ministers (apparently Harold Wilson was her favourite) and she has helped the nation through traumatic times such as the Suez crisis and the miners' strike of 1984-85. For that reason I reckon that when the sad day comes when she dies. it will be a genuinely traumatic moment. not just for her older subjects. who find it easy to identify with her. but for the whole UK.
By not promoting herself. she has become a most popular national symbol. Without being at all ghoulish. I now reckon it would be better were she to hand over to her son Charles sooner rather than later. A dignified abdication would be in keeping with the tone she has set.
Although our Queen was 80 earlier this year. such is the arcane nature of constitutional monarchy that it is not until this week that she celebrates her so-called official. as opposed to her real. this is perhaps a good time to take stock.
The Queen was born in a house in Bruton Street. at a time of extreme national unrest and division. A rancorous miners' strike was escalating into what was to be the brief but bitter General Strike of 1926.
Paradoxically. 17 Bruton Street was the home of her grandparents. the Earl and Countess of Strathmore. and the earl was one of the country's richest coal kings. a man who owned many mines. So. though she could hardly help it. that was an unfortunate start for the future monarch; and yet one of our Queen's triumphs is that she has always managed to avoid being identified with any sectional or class interest.
She has been at the centre of the national stage for well over 50 years and she has hardly ever put a foot wrong. despite constant scrutiny. Of course. in Scotland many of us validly resent the fact that she is officially but erroneously known here as Elizabeth II. for north of the border she is Elizabeth I. But it was our own Scottish Court of Session. that decided that she would be known in Scotland. as Elizabeth II.
My personal and probably fanciful hunch is that she has so successfully been the symbol of the UK that she wishes to beat her distinguished forbear. and reign for more than 64 years. Unlike that of Victoria. her reign has not coincided with a period of growing national power and success. Quite the contrary.
The UK is much diminished internationally from what it was when she was crowned. Now it is a mere bit player in the world. not even the most important country in Europe any more.
Yet this small and self-effacing woman. with her constant dignity and reticence. has been a reassuring figure during the years of decline. which have also been years of swift and intensive social and cultural change. and persistent technological and biological innovation. Somehow. she has always managed to present a serene and steadying presence in confusing and unsettling times.
Of course. it's all very well being calm and reassuring. but she has also eschewed emotion and she has been. a little dull. In 1983 this newspaper celebrated its bicentenary. Two of the distinguished visitors to The Herald offices that year were the then prime minister. and the Queen.
Even Mrs Thatcher's many critics among The Herald staff had to admit that her visit went remarkably well. It helped that she arrived late in the evening. Drink had been taken. and continued to be taken. and if the truth were told. Mrs Thatcher enjoyed one or two whiskies herself. As she progressed from floor to floor. followed by an increasingly jovial entourage of executives. dignitaries and other hangers on. her visit turned into an unlikely triumph. When she reached the picture desk she sat down. kicked off her shoes and opined loudly on the pictures on offer.
By contrast. the Queen's visit was quiet and restrained. and it reflected her idea of the monarchy: dutiful. a little buttoned up. never risking controversy. The Queen's notion of being regal most certainly does not involve trying to be a Queen of Hearts. And that is probably how a constitutional monarch should be.
Indeed. it is because our Queen has been so effective in subsuming her emotions. her opinions and to some extent her personality that she has been such an effective and unifying force in our national life. She has seen off nine prime ministers (apparently Harold Wilson was her favourite) and she has helped the nation through traumatic times such as the Suez crisis and the miners' strike of 1984-85. For that reason I reckon that when the sad day comes when she dies. it will be a genuinely traumatic moment. not just for her older subjects. who find it easy to identify with her. but for the whole UK.
By not promoting herself. she has become a most popular national symbol. Without being at all ghoulish. I now reckon it would be better were she to hand over to her son Charles sooner rather than later. A dignified abdication would be in keeping with the tone she has set.
Endor/Wake the President. GlasgowFallout from Forest Gate'Free care' needs proper financial resourcesPoints of viewTonight's TVIngo PremingerWhat a dragThe right track at lastConservatives must come in from electoral coldLooming blood bank crisisShe's done a super job. but it's time for the Queen to goKen ThomsonThe music of hate is the soundtrack of their livesThe Marriage of Figaro. His Majesty's Theatre. AberdeenWhen nuns shall pass musterCarol ScottJackie Mason. Glasgow Royal Concert Hall